User talk:Pedroperezhumberto

Welcome!

Hello, Pedroperezhumberto, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 18:31, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kwangwoon University station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Line 1 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ansan station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jungang Station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:41, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit on DMZ Train

Hi there PPH.....I am not following this edit you made [1]. I think it is supposed to be the 1st train station of the trip and the last. Can you explain why you added Dongducheon Station, which is neither? Thanks.--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 05:47, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting your edit.--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 11:21, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you are new to Wikipedia, there is an edit rule about Reverting each other Wikipedia:Edit warring, please talk to me here about the changes you have made. It does not make sense to abbeviate station names that have complete names. I will give you some time to think about this. We also should put the discussion on the Talk page Talk:DMZ Train to get input from other editors. If you can't agree to revert your changes, I will add the Discussion tomorrow.--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 11:34, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Korea!

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's Korea-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Korea? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of all Korea-related articles. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! Bonnielou2013 (talk) 05:49, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to South Western Railway (train operating company), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 14:13, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kirby Cross railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greater Anglia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merseyrail unit photos

Hello, please could you stop changing the photos of the stock, as in my view the replacements you are choosing are not as good. If you disagree, i'd suggest asking others on the talk page to ascertain general opinion. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:46, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fine! Do it your way. Pedroperezhumberto 17:09, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's not a case of doing it my way, your way or someone else's way, but just that I don't feel the changes were a net positive and would encourage you to determine wider opinion if you wanted to pursue it. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:22, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Pedroperezhumberto 19:40, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to say the same thing regarding TransPennine Express. Rcsprinter¹²³ (negotiate) 15:52, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fine!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I get it. Don't tell me again. OK? Also, that the Class 185's for TransPennine Express are not supposed to have the number of the class on it. Pedroperezhumberto 16:55, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Pedroperezhumberto 17:38 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Please remember that Wikipedia operates based on consensus. It looks like you have made what you think are helpful edits to a number of articles, but these edits have been opposed and reverted by other editors. What you need to do next is discuss the matter at the respective articles' talk pages and get support from other editors for the changes. You should not and may not just keep trying to changes the images over and over. —C.Fred (talk) 18:37, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. -Pedroperezhumberto 19:43, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"158/8"

Stop it and do research before making correct information (158/0) incorrect!!! Anamyd (talk) 17:59, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I won't do it again. Pedroperezhumberto 19:06, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 11:44, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop replacing images otherwise you're going to be blocked, Go to the talkpage on each article and make your case(s) as why X is better than Y, Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 11:46, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Pedroperezhumberto 12:51, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 11:51, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I appreciate it. Pedroperezhumberto 12:54, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I need to change a photo on Caledonian Sleeper. Pedroperezhumberto 18:18, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, Also please dont remove content cheers –Davey2010^Talk 20:25, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Pedroperezhumberto 12:22, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I need to change a photo on Great Western Railway. Pedroperezhumberto 20:17, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What photo and why? Can you also leave an edit summary when making changes as otherwise nobody knows what you're trying to achieve to improve the encyclopedia. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:28, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion errors

It looks like I made several mistakes earlier reverting WP:CRYSTAL edits you had made but self-reverted. It meant that I reinstated your self-corrected mistakes, and you had to remove them again. My apologies to you, and thanks for clearing up again. Bazza (talk) 19:10, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Pedroperezhumberto 20:18, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TfL Rail and Crossrail/Elizabeth line

You have made a large number of edits implying that TfL Rail runs services (or will start to do so imminently) on the Great Western main line from Paddington to Reading. With the exception of stations to Heathrow, there are no such services and are likely to be none until 2021. Please undo your edits which suggest otherwise. Bazza (talk) 17:20, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Once again you are inserting incorrect information. TfL have announced taking over the GWR service on 15 December 2019. It's still 27 November here, so please wait. It's not a competition. Bazza (talk) 18:39, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

/* Current fleet */ 1999 3-car 170s built under ADtranz, 2002 2-car 170s built under Bombardier after 2001 takeover of Derby Litchurch Lane (regardless of window glass logos)

Did you not see this...? --Anamyd (talk) 19:07, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, Anamyd. --Pedroperezhumberto 18:30, 4 April 2020 (BST)

Stop it!!! on the 170 article

You moved the text "Driving vehicle pairs to transfer to EMR in 2020, centre cars to CrossCountry to lengthen their 170/5s" from its correct table row (West Midlands Railway 170/6s) to an incorrect table row (CrossCountry 170/5s).

You also removed the text "these will be lengthened to 3-car units in 2020 (see below)" from the CrossCountry 170/5 table row.

I'm not sure why you changed something from correct to incorrect, and removed text that served a purpose, in the first place (and perhaps you could tell me why you did that, and then changed what I corrected *back* to be incorrect *again*...?)

Then, when I moved the text "Driving vehicle pairs to transfer to EMR in 2020, centre cars to CrossCountry to lengthen their 170/5s" from its incorrect table row (CrossCountry 170/5s) back to its correct table row (West Midlands Railway 170/6s), which involved me using the visual editor on my PC with Edge set to the iPad (Safari) user agent, I did so without also reinstating the removed text "these will be lengthened to 3-car units in 2020 (see below)" to the CrossCountry 170/5 table row. This was because I assumed that you had a problem with that text being there, but clearly that's not the case.

Do you just make nonsense edits for the sake of it, or do you not understand that 6 WMR units will give their centre cars to 6 XC units (not the nonsensical "6 XC units giving their centre cars to themselves")...?

All the best, take care. Anamyd (talk) 21:30, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Anamyd. Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 16:42, 11 April 2020 (BST)

Fixing over-capitalization

While you're "fixing something" in infobox titles, maybe you can consider also fixing the over-capitalization of "Station" there. They should generally be lowercase station, or just remove the word station, since it's not part of the actual station name, usually. Dicklyon (talk) 17:50, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Culture & Arts Center station (Changsha) move

Hello! I've seen you moved Culture and Arts Center station to Culture & Arts Center station (Changsha) saying that there is a homonym station in Incheon Metro.

I later have seen the strange disambiguation key so I decided to move Culture & Arts Center station (Changsha) to Culture & Arts Center station (Changsha Metro), but later I've seen that Culture & Arts Center station doesn't exist (so this page is unused).

If there is a risk that the reader gets confused he should found a disambiguation page (in Culture & Arts Center station and similarly also in Culture and Arts Center station) showing the stations that have the same name.

I don't see in Incheon Metro a station with the same name, so maybe the disambiguation of the station of the Changsha Metro could be not necessary.

Could you help to fix this (there is also a double redirect created by me that have to be fixed...)?

Thanks you in advance ZandDev (msg) 11:24, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya, I will fix this as soon as possible. Thank you! Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 12:36, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For the Incheon Metro, there is a station called "Culture & Arts Center" on Incheon Subway Line 1, which got renamed from Arts Center station a couple of years ago to match the Hangul translation of the station name. I hope you understand it now! Thanks, Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 12:38, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

首尔

首尔 is 수이 in Korean, not 서울. (but it is Seoul in Chinese.)
Korean 벤처 is from English venture, and Chinese 创投 is from venture.
Korean 타운 is from English town. And 城 is town in Chinese, but it is not from English town.
波拉美 is 파랍미 in Korean, not 보라매.

Please don't confuse Hanja with (simplified) Chinese. 27.35.76.248 (talk) 16:10, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth line

Please double check the timetable on the TfL website. Off-peak trains from Reading do NOT call at Iver and is evident by the timetable for the Elizabeth line. Jalen Folf (talk) 21:02, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

KeolisAmey vs Keolis Amey

I don't agree with your various changes of KeolisAmey to Keolis Amey, nor do I agree with the page move. Please can we take this to somewhere like Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways to get wider consensus? 10mmsocket (talk) 10:10, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I did not move KeolisAmey Operations to Keolis Amey Operations, someone else did the move. I was just updating the pages following the move.

You have your own right to revert them in your own wish, it is fine, I won’t deal with it firmly.

Thank you, Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 10:14, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the speedy response, it is appreciated. Keolis Amey Operations is actually the parent of KeolisAmey Wales and KeolisAmey Docklands so the move was incorrect. I have requested that the move is reverted (I can't do the move myself, it needs an admin). Obviously once revered you'd be very welcome to join in the discussion. Thanks again. 10mmsocket (talk) 10:18, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thanks again for requesting to revert it, it is very appreciated. I do understand that Keolis Amey Operations is the parent of KeolisAmey Wales and KeolisAmey Docklands so their move was incorrect. I would be very welcome to join the discussion.

Thanks again, Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 10:26, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They have now reverted it back to KeolisAmey Wales. This dispute is now over once and for all.

Thanks, Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 13:23, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again,

After the ruckus earlier, I want to say that I am sorry for doing this and if I ever need to move an article, I will discuss it first. Thank you and we will take it from here into a more better Wikipedia for all of us.

Thank you and with my apologies, Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 18:15, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pedroperezhumberto, @10mmsocket, Hi, I added the space, based on the argument that we were using the legal name and well all the sources used had a space when referring to the legal company, so though it made more sense to have the space using that argument, although it does look better without the space. Thanks Dank Jae 19:06, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DankJae,

Thanks for replying and reverting the edit. I have seen your comment on the talk page for KeolisAmey Wales and I am very sorry for what I did. I will never do this again. If I ever need to move a page, I will ask you or discuss in the talk page of the article.

Thanks and with my sincere apology, Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 19:14, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tbh you do have a point. TfW articles have a long history of moving around so naturally wanted some stability, I believe this is the article's 9th move in four years :D. Happy editing :) Dank Jae 21:39, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi. Please note that there's no need to routinely add REVERT THIS EDIT IF NEEDED to your edit summaries, and especially not in all-caps. Some people might include something like feel free to revert if they were making a potentially-controversial change on which they had no strong preference, which is perfectly fine, but in general it's just assumed that any edit can be reverted at will and that text in all-caps is the equivalent of shouting. Cheers. XAM2175 ^(T) 10:48, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are placing what I assume to be references in your edit summaries. This is bad practice. Put anything like this into the article as a properly formatted reference. A reader should be able to verify that a fact is correct WP:V and references aid this process - but you can't expect them to trawl through the edit summaries. See WP:BURDEN - you need to do this. 10mmsocket (talk) 21:36, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merseyrail

According to the ORR (i.e. the British Government transport department) [2] and National Rail [3] (not to mention Merseyrail themselves (see the last line on this link) Merseyrail is indeed a TOC. We have to go by reliable sources here. I suspect the fact that it is in the template is that Serco-Abellio used to own other franchises, but they no longer do - just Merseyrail. Them being there isn't wrong exactly, but it is Merseyrail that is referred to as the TOC. Black Kite (talk) 15:05, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think I may have acted in haste here, it's down to me. It looks like Merseyrail Electrics Ltd is indeed the operator of the Merseyrail franchise on the Merseyrail network. Merseyrail Electrics Ltd is 50/50 joint venture owned by Serco and Abellio. So I was wrong to put Serco Abellio in the UK TOCs template. However I do think that what should really go there is "Merseyrail Electrics" not simply "Merseyrail". Thoughts? 10mmsocket (talk) 17:17, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think you're probably correct. The confusion may be caused by Merseyrail (the network) vs Merseyrail (the TOC). Black Kite (talk) 17:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Night buses in London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Redbridge.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

iBus

Hello. How are you? I was just wondering where fo you get your information from, regarding the iBus edits you have been making in the past few weeks? If there is a website/webpage, then could you please cite it? Many thanks :) Roads4117 (talk) 15:55, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bus Routes in London Wiki

Please do not use Bus Routes in London Wiki as a source in articles. It is a WP:SPS and thus not reliable. Deameojim (talk) 01:41, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

London Buses route 12

added a link pointing to Lambeth North

London Buses route 7

added a link pointing to Westbourne Park

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Siheung Neunggok station

Hello, Pedroperezhumberto, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Siheung Neunggok station, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siheung Neunggok station.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (talk) 01:52, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Dalmi station

Hello, Pedroperezhumberto, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Dalmi station, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalmi station.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (talk) 01:55, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Seonbu station

Hello, Pedroperezhumberto, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Seonbu station, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seonbu station.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (talk) 01:57, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Wonsi station

Hello, Pedroperezhumberto, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Wonsi station, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wonsi station.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (talk) 02:13, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Siu station

Hello, Pedroperezhumberto, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Siu station, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siu station.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (talk) 02:17, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Siheung City Hall station

Hello, Pedroperezhumberto, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Siheung City Hall station, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siheung City Hall station.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (talk) 02:18, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Sinhyeon station

Hello, Pedroperezhumberto, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Sinhyeon station, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinhyeon station.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (talk) 02:20, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Siheung Daeya station

Hello, Pedroperezhumberto, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Siheung Daeya station, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siheung Daeya station.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (talk) 02:26, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Wonjong station

Hello, Pedroperezhumberto, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Wonjong station, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wonjong station.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (talk) 02:28, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited London Buses route 108, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North Greenwich.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:First Beeline Logo Apr 23.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:First Beeline Logo Apr 23.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into London Buses route SL7. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. I have completed the move as requested at WP:RMTR. Jack Frost (talk) 14:38, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

Please do not add uncited text as you have done a number of times at London Buses route 68, London Buses route SL8 etc. Hsparsity (talk) 02:18, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gupo station (Busan Metro)

The article Gupo station (Busan Metro) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:15, 18 October 2023 (UTC) Chris Troutman (talk) 17:59, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

London bus images

I noticed that you started to replace images on London bus routes with more recent ones. However, some of the pics are not exactly of a good quality (too blurry, or have weird angles, or obstruction etc), and per MOS:IMAGEQUALITY we should try to avoid such images that are not of ideal quality unless absolutely necessary (no free available equivalent etc). And to be very honest, there's no need to update the images when not much has changed (for example if the depicted bus model is still running on the route or if the routing hasn't changed), because in the end we'll be picturing the same thing just of a different month/year etc.

I'm not trying to say that you shouldn't continue taking photos of buses and contributing (we all come from somewhere, and to be honest I won't consider some of my very first uploads to be of high quality either), and as a matter of fact some of your pics are acceptable as well (examples File:LT525 on Seven Sisters Road.jpg, File:HV66 on Green Lanes.jpg). However I hope you can consider whether the pictures you are planning to upload looks presentable on an encyclopedia before pressing the publish edit button, because like I said on the route 149 page the ones that are too grainy or are obstructed too much are (at least for me personally) the ones that will probably be more unpresentable.

S5A-0043^Talk 04:18, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'm not sure whether you read this already so I'll ping you just in case @Pedroperezhumberto, but I just reverted some of your edits on routes 36 73 and 74 on grounds of MOS:IMAGEQUALITY as they're clearly inferior compared to the previous pic. Take for example route 74. The image you uploaded is particularly blurry that I can't read the license plate at all, which pretty much satisfies "Poor-quality images—dark or blurry" as stated on MOS:IMAGEQUALITY, as compared to the original one which I'm sure we both can agree that is much clearer. Please consider whether your picture is better than the original one before publishing instead of blindly uploading newer images that are not clear at all, otherwise I may have to take up the issue somewhere else such as WP:DRN. S5A-0043^Talk 06:19, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Original research # 2

Please do not add uncited text as you have done a number of times at London Buses route 68, London Buses route SL8 etc. Hsparsity (talk) 02:42, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note

I have reverted your image edit on London Buses route 433 since it is outdated (it says "West Croydon" on the blinds, to which service was cut in 2019), and there is a better alternative available (this image). Feel free to discuss btw. — MATRIX! (a good person!)_{[citation unneeded]} 19:42, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Original research # 3

Can you please adding uncited text as you did at Blue Triangle and London General. Please take the time to familiar yourself with WP:RS, WP:OR and WP:VNT. Hsparsity (talk) 06:14, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Metroline. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SovalValtos (talk) 17:14, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Original research # 4

You cannot just change text and leave the existing cites that do not back up the changes e.g. London Buses route 1 where you changed the types of vehicle operated but did not add any new cites. This is now manifesting into a problem, where you are trying to add the same text into the infobox claiming that it is cited, when all you are really doing is copying the uncited text you added.

Or in London Buses route 466 where you are adding text and just copying cites from other parts of the article that don't back up what you are adding. Even worse is London Buses route 4 where you are just copying cites from other articles that make no mention of what you are adding. I have checked the cite provided and it does not state what you are trying to claim it does.

Despite numerous requests from a number of editors over the last six months asking you to stop adding uncited text that is WP:OR, you have continued to do so. Please take this as a final warning; should it continue, administrator intervention will be sought. Hsparsity (talk) 23:36, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello Pedroperezhumberto!

The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited London Buses route SL8, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acton Vale.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Transport UK London Bus

You removed information that is correct. I wasn't responsible for the Route 290 info, but I can confirm it, as I travel on this route regularly. As for the electric buses on the R70, this is a personal observation, first noted by me on 12 March, and I am seeing them whenever I go into central Twickenham. I think they may have the same buses on the 235, but I don't get around as much as I used to so I don't usually see them. Anyway, the info deleted is correct. Donnanz (talk) 16:46, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, the 235 is a London United route, operated from Hounslow Heath depot, so forget that bit. Donnanz (talk) 17:20, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Following your latest edits, it looks as though the only way to solve your scepticism will be to take a photo or two and add one to the page via Commons. You obviously don't believe me. Donnanz (talk) 11:12, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that, but I had it down as unsourced information as there was no source to what you said. Sorry about that. Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 11:30, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the information back for the sake of this, but this still needs a source.

Oh well, it was spotted by you so ok.

Sorry about this. — Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 11:33, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Taken from the LOTS (London Omnibus Traction Society) webpage:

"Over half of Transport UK's first batch of Wright GB Kite electric single-deckers (1705-1712) are now in service on route R70 from Fulwell/Twickenham (TF). This batch had been intended for route E7 from Southall (GW), with later batch 1725-1736 earmarked for the R70." But I will add a photo eventually. Donnanz (talk) 11:48, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot about that. Again, I am sorry for removing it. Will add this source later. Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 12:15, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have now added the reference to this. You need to click News and then scroll down to "Latest news". Sorry if this made you go crazy, it's because it was originally unsourced. — Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 13:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You might need to archive it, I'm not sure how that's done, and when that info will be removed from the page.

I hadn't noticed until today, travelling in and out of Twickenham on the 490, that all their buses now seem to have the Transport UK logo replacing Abellio. Yet the legal address remains the same for now, Abellio West London. That may change later. Cheers for now. Donnanz (talk) 14:27, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alrighty, will archive it.

The legal name on GOV.UK for Abellio West London LTD did change to Transport UK West London Bus Limited. Don't believe me? Search Transport UK West London Bus Limited and you'll see. They haven't updated it on the buses yet but they did online on GOV.UK. — Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 14:46, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I should have qualified that comment, I meant as it appears on the buses at present, with an SE5 (Camberwell) postcode. Donnanz (talk) 15:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As it does.

Just like the other legal name on GOV.UK, this one (Abellio London Limited) for the buses at Camberwell has changed to Transport UK London Bus Limited, but hasn't been changed on the buses.

Another thing - I have just archived the LOTS link and will modify that reference with the archived link (you still have to click News and scroll down to Latest news however.) — Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 15:30, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm seeing news up to 29 January, not to 17 March, and news before 17 February doesn't appear in the latest (today's) update. Did you file an earlier update somehow? They certainly don't keep the news there for very long. Donnanz (talk) 16:25, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't file an earlier one, I archived the website today with today's update. I wonder why this is happening for you… no idea why! It's happening to me as well. I did archive it today, no idea why it's doing this. Will look into and will update you soon. — Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 16:33, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no clue as to why this is doing this. Do you have an idea as to why?

For now, I'll leave it as it is and try to rectify this. — Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 16:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not familiar with archiving. The only thing I can suggest, is that as the update is so new (today), it may not have filtered through to Google etc., so they aren't recording it yet. That may happen overnight. It may be OK if you try again tomorrow. Donnanz (talk) 17:52, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, alright. Thank you!

I'll try again tomorrow and see what happens. If it doesn't work then, I'll try next week.

Thanks again. — Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 18:05, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's working on my end!

It now shows the news for 17 March. Try it for yourself! — Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 20:29, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that's great. I was crossing my fingers, hoping my idea would work. It obviously did. I saw No. 1708 in Twickenham today. Donnanz (talk) 00:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested in using this photo, of one of the first electric buses, seen at Hounslow in 2019. Judging by the registration, it was built ten years ago. Donnanz (talk) 10:26, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image has been used in Category:Hounslow bus garage (Wikimedia Commons). I had no idea it was there! Donnanz (talk) 00:14, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Eastman Village" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Eastman Village has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 17 § Eastman Village until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:56, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Harrow View

Hello, Pedroperezhumberto

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Викидим and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Harrow View, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20 § Harrow View.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Викидим}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Викидим (talk) 22:45, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there.

I created this redirect because of a bus that terminates there. If you want to delete it, you are more than welcome to. I will just simply change the link.

Thanks! — Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 07:48, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

whoops forgot something

@Викидим:

thanks Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 07:49, 21 March 2024 (UTC) Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 07:49, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A short description of the Harrow View in Harrow will make the link meaningful (of course, if it is WP:DUE, I do not know how important is Harrow View in Harrow). Before creating an RFD, I have checked, and did not see any incoming links to this redirect, so there are no links to modify yet. Викидим (talk) 20:22, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Delta Point" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Delta Point has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 30 § Delta Point until a consensus is reached. Cielquiparle (talk) 06:36, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm Maurice Oly. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, West Midlands Trains, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Maurice Oly (talk) 17:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there.

I was in a rush, so I couldn't add a source in time. Sorry about that. I'll have a look for a better source and when I find one, I'll add it. Sorry about this. Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 17:49, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again.

Someone else has done this edit and added a source - no need for me to do it! Oh well. At least that saves me time. Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 17:57, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mobility Buses London

Hello, I'm Tehepicbigman712. I have managed to find some more information regarding the mobility bus network including routes 902, 917, 922, 941, 958 & 972. I have been able to locate an official timetable for routes 902 & 922 from a FOI request for the both of the routes. As for the other routes, I managed to find them from another FOI where the timetables and leaflets of the mobility bus network were requested. And yes, to answer your question, the 917 did run to Croydon. It went from Park Hill Rise to Croydon, but I believe this route was the shortest mobility route to operate. Tehepicbigman712 (talk) 19:32, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect! Thank you for improving this article. Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 07:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Haven Line signage

The actual signage at New Haven Line stations uses the signage style encoded in the Metro-North Railroad style, not the CTrail style. These styles only affect how the infobox looks - they do not change the wording of the page. Please don't change it to the incorrect style. Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, wasn't aware about it.

I was unsure as Merritt 7 station has the same CTrail signage, even though it is served by MNRR.

Just revert every single edit on this, I wasn't sure. Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 19:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, the styles can be a bit confusing. You are correct about Merritt 7; I've changed that to the CTrail style. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I am not from the USA so I was honestly confused.

Thanks for that about Merritt 7, it did have the CTrail signage when the platform was rebuilt. Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 20:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One other note: while New Haven State Street station uses the abbreviation "St" on signage, the official name does not use the abbreviation (see MNRR website). For everything except the infobox title, I would use either "New Haven State Street" or "State Street", not "State St". Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah alright, sorry about that. It's because I would normally use what's on the station signage. Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 19:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. For everything except the name in the infobox, I would use whatever name MNRR uses on its website. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:57, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alrighty - will do. Pedroperezhumberto (talk) 19:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Charville Lane Estate" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Charville Lane Estate has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 26 § Charville Lane Estate until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 22:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited London Buses route 211, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lister Hospital.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Operators in London bus route articles

Articles should reflect what cites state, not what you think they should state. Even though Go-Ahead London is the umbrella brand, TfL clearly states that the contracts it awards are to the subsidiary companies, e.g: 176 to London Central and 444 to London General. Same applies with RATP Dev Transit London with route 395 to London Sovereign and 411 to London United. Same applies to Stagecoach London with route 20 to East London and route SL3 with Selkent. This is reinforced by Buses also reporting the awarding of contracts to the subsidiaries and not the umbrella brands. Hsparsity (talk) 04:40, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Original research # 5

Despite repeated requests, you are continuing to add uncited text, e.g. at route 68 and route SL8. Do you have any cites to back these changes up? It not, please stop reinstating them and SHOUTING at those who disagree with your original research. It is in clear breach of verification policy, and you know it. Hsparsity (talk) 05:05, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI-notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hsparsity (talk) 00:32, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LIRR station names

The names you've changed for many of the Long Island Rail Road stations, are actually supplemental destinations. In other words, Oakdale LIRR station isn't named "Oakdale: Amity Education Group," Freeport LIRR station isn't named "Freeport: Jones Beach State Park," Ronkonkoma LIRR station isn't named "Ronkonkoma; LI MacArthur Airport," etcetera. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 22:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]